The authorities of my country told everyone to stay at home, but they did not support them financially. People either die of hunger or go to work, so everyone in the country works, find loopholes to justify going to work. This is sad because many continue to get sick.
this is certainly a dilemma that occurs in developing countries, on the one hand the need to make ends meet as a necessity of life must be met. if it does not work, of course there will be no wages that will be used to buy necessities of life. but if it continues to work there will be a risk of transmission of the pandemic. which is feared in developing countries if they do a "lockdown" but the government is not sufficient with assistance. a new pandemic will emerge, which is hunger, but if it develops into riots it is more dangerous.
developing means poorer countries or rich already ? poorer countries were lacking of support from thier government not the wealthy countries . i see its hard to choose because many possibilities can happen . to work and to face risk or not to work but to face hunger ? we cant also say people will work from home because not all forms of jobs are applicable to this . these people need help the most and limit the help to others as much as possible in order for the supply to last long