Quote from: DireWolfM14 on July 16, 2020, 06:29:03 PM

Yes, here's a perfect example of him using big words and walls of text to feign a highly developed and impressive intellect. While the premise of his argument starts out about anarchy, what he actually describes is far from it. I'ts almost like he doesn't know the meaning of the word, but he must, mustn't he? His waffling about the word, and vacillations in logic are actually kind of pedestrian, and mostly just drivel to fill out what initially looks like a well thought-out and contributory post, but is actually nothing but a shit post (in my opinion.)

Don't worry if you don't understand. Apparently, the topic wasn't addressed to you. Nor to many others.

Quote from: nullius on January 21, 2020, 11:02:45 PM

Mine is the anarchy of the few, of the natural aristocrats who were not born to be slaves. It is by individual anarchy that they must escape the tyranny which the mob, with its innate slave-mentality, has freely chosen and voted into existence by the dead weight of numeric majorities.

I highlighted why you don't understand the meaning of that topic. You will never understand it if you have the IQ of a shoe. The topic was addressed to really intelligent people and they are extremely few compared to all the others. It was addressed to well educated people, which are able to understand such a deep meaning. I am a bit surprised though, as I didn't expect that from you. I would expect it from a notorious illiterate such as hacker, which doesn't even know the difference between the plural and the "'s" article which, in English, represents the possession.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on June 21, 2020, 05:31:23 AM

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on June 21, 2020, 01:58:37 AM

Movie's, Movie's, Movie's. ! Grin

Actually, you should have written "Movies, Movies, Movies" instead of "Movie's, Movie's, Movie's". "Movies" is the plural of "movie" and the term you were looking for. "Movie's" means "of the movie", as "'s" in English represents the genitive article indicating the possession. I'm not an English native, but I know the grammar.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on February 21, 2020, 08:07:15 PM

Vires in numeris!

Unfortunately for you, young padawan, you never knew this! Nor you knew Latin (I suppose).

A while ago I noticed you don't know Latin. Now it turns out that you don't know English as well. One more reason to wonder who would hire an illiterate campaign manager lol.

But it seems that you also don't have the necessary prerequisites for understanding that topic.