Quote from: NeuroticFish on June 30, 2020, 12:48:19 PM

Quote from: tbct_mt2 on June 30, 2020, 12:14:04 PM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on June 30, 2020, 10:51:22 AM

Also it worth mentioning that in the GOLD campaign the requirements for the number of posts are much better (less spammy!) than for most other campaigns.

Most of participants are good users and not spammers. I see your names and recognize who you are on the forum.

I guess that I was misunderstood.
What I meant is that for everybody after a certain number of posts, the quality can decrease. But GOLD requirement is far from high, so there's no pressure, so GOLD users will most probably always achieve very good quality of posts.

Quote from: tbct_mt2 on June 30, 2020, 12:14:04 PM

Indeed. People don't aware of the campaign because it is not paid in BTC and it has not been shown in the Mitchell's topic. People who aware of it but fear to join because their doubts on legitimacy and validity of GOLD project.

The fact the campaign pays in token makes it a no-go for many. Name it laziness, name it extra-cautiousness, doesn't matter, the result is the same. The fact the campaign manager is from GOLD team and not somebody known can make people even more cautious.
I can say that I also came in only after seeing good feedback from others (feedback with was and still is scarce).
But the campaign is one year old now, people should have been convinced by now that the campaign is good.

Kinda accurate, when I came across this project it looked shady idk why may be the thread representation wasn't a quality, and it put me off. Still gave a try because of lack of good campaigns and this was paying in stable coin (better than gambling in ICO campaigns), thought to myself, if it turns of well then good otherwise well one month for learning lol.