Quote from: LoyceV on June 30, 2020, 06:13:09 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on June 30, 2020, 03:04:34 AM

Maybe not - perhaps "like minded persons" instead?

That makes sense. But if they're "like minded", isn't it likely they have similar Trust lists too?

An interesting question.

Quote

Quote

Just to clarify, I've never investigated ETH addresses, but I will sift through BTC wallets and if there are dozens of wallet addresses that are used by multiple alts then the connections are there. Solid Gold.

Thanks for the correction. The long lists of ETH-addresses was the first that came to mind. But long posts take a lot of time to read and verify, especially if it requires checking references.

(Just a thought bubble here) Perhaps if there are 100 links that also have archived links and you were to randomly choose five out of those 100 references, then (statstically speaking) wouldn't it stand to reason if you could randomly verify five to be valid, then more if not all references would be valid.

I'm always surprised at the sheer numbers of ETH investigations, it'll take me minutes to find connections, then an hour to type up a report.

Quote

Quote

In other news (and to get the discussion back on topic), does anyone have any questions about this:

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html

Without checking all usernames: from what I've seen last time, this is an improvement.

Thanks, it's always good to do a little sweep out of the cobwebs.

Quote

Quote

Without knowing *anything* about these UID's

I instantly recognize several of those users from this topic: User got voted into DT1 by sockpuppets.

I hadn't thought to check ito-marketing as well as it was adding me, not removing. It turns out that's yet another shill/alt of the others, so

Code:

~ito-marketing

etc.