Quote from: mindrust on June 30, 2020, 09:10:14 PM

Cobra is mysterious and Theymos is not? Huh

How about satoshi? Cheesy

Well, yeah, theymos is mysterious too, but at least we know his stance and that he is pro-Bitcoin, while there is more questions about Cobra.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:41:19 AM

just because someone has a different opinion than you, it is not a reason to not-trust them even if that opinion were wrong.
conversely having the same opinion as you doesn't make someone trustworthy (wolf in sheep clothing).
[/quote]
You're right. But when owner of Bitcoin.org website makes pro BCH tweets, it gives some doubts about that personality

Quote from: jseverson on Today at 07:37:38 AM

The thing though, is that it isn't. It doesn't matter whether Cobra or theymos has ownership, you can never write off the possibility that it becomes compromised. I get that it can suck to have no "official" Bitcoin resource, but that's probably for the best -- look at @Bitcoin on twitter and how much drama that used to cause (well it still does but on the opposite camp now lol).

And since it seems like you're lobbying for theymos, it may be relevant to show his insight on a similar matter:

Very good point! Words "official" and "Bitcoin" probably shouldn't be used in same sentence. There is no thing like official Bitcoin website, forum, wallet or Twitter account. Such things is just impossible when we talk about decentralized currency. The problem is that people consider these resources as official websites and they 100% trust in information that they found there.
And I wouldn't call it as lobbying. I just used theymos as example, who would be more suitable to run Bitcoin.org in my opinion in hypotetical situation