Quote from: marlboroza on July 06, 2020, 04:48:42 PM

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on July 06, 2020, 02:11:28 AM

I would probably prefer not commenting on such false accusations as this thread itself is an clear evidence of mobbing, double standards and harmful witch hunting leading to nothing solid.

You are just another ICO bump account

Could you provide proof of this claim please? I don't mean references from 500 days ago, but in the present, ideally in the past week or month. Either that, or you mean "You were just another ICO bump account". Accuracy is key here, otherwise it comes across as unnecessary slander. I apologize if your English isn't up to scratch with past and present tenses, but I very much believe it is.

Just to clarify, I'm not interested in some rebuttal on "everything hacker1001101001 did the past [insert references here]. I read the accusations as well as the apologies, I verified a signature, I've seen (all) of the negative feedback and the flag. I understand that you want to get to the bottom of this, but it seems that in all likelihood you won't, especially if the witch-hunt appears never-ending*. He's at -4 DT negs, there is an active flag against his account. If he is "stalking" (strong word!) his accusers in other threads as a form of retaliation against his accusers, it doesn't make it right to retaliate in return. It's not a good luck either imo.

No-one is doubting he did shady shit in the past (even him), and for that you're more than welcome to distrust him, even neg him if that's how you feel, but turning this into a 40 page topic* regarding someone's reputation really isn't necessary imo. For reference sake before you go investigating:, I don't trust hacker, or distrust them, I simply don't believe "anyone dealing with hacker1001101001 is at a high risk of losing money". If this was a flag from when they were engaging in these well-referenced accusations, then I wouldn't be opposing such a flag. If there was a flag that claimed "anyone dealing with hacker1001101001 was at a high risk of losing money", I'd also probably support it. It's easy for people to suddenly "change" for their own benefit when they are confronted on the crap they've done, it's a lot different than when someone changes before being called out imo.

Just my two cents, don't take it personally Wink

TL:DR: Nothing relevant to see here.

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on January 04, 2020, 04:10:29 AM

I am not turning the story but rather willing to agree on my mistakes back then. Yes, I have left it and would never do it again.

This was a dozen pages ago.

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on July 06, 2020, 02:11:28 AM

I didn't deny it, they are just some old transactions between me and other users whom I don't know specifically.

This was page 14.