Quote from: hacker1001101001 on Today at 06:06:58 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 05:55:37 AM

Quote from: dragonvslinux on Today at 05:37:53 AM

This would be related to this unresolved situation: Re: To all DT1 members | Interesting negative feedback from JollyGood!

From that topic:

Quote from: JollyGood

I am a very approachable person, if someone wants to send a PM and ask me to reconsider or would like me explain various things to me in order to change feedback to include/exclude on my Trust list I am very happy to engage with users. The OP should have sent me a PM

Have you tried that gumusi?

Ok, so it's expectable for DT1's to slap agendic and illogical feedbacks on users trust wall and demand for an PM to remove it or get it changed to neutral or beg to the DT (who you feel is racist) for reconsideng the feedback. This should go in some DT guide, I guess.

OP, is not obligate to send PM, I already had bad experiences with many DTs in PM on such feedback cases, it's doesn't turn right.

even if some groundless claims fail, they form a bad place in the memory of society (this creates some kind of perception). Clear and groundless claims made on people must be explicitly rejected. Thus, a good position can be achieved in the perception of society.

If dt1 members know that their claims are blank, they should first ask the matter from the private message and wait for an answer about it. if their claims are weak, they should not give negative feedback.

they can make bad impressions about people when they make mistakes by acting hastily.