Quote from: LAngel on Today at 08:40:26 PM

Quote from: alani123 on Today at 08:38:39 PM

Quote from: LAngel on Today at 08:29:11 PM

anyone wondering how the cheat worked, it wasnt hacking at all.
it was the koi princess slot by netent i cheated at, NOT dawn of olympus. like i said before, that 171 btc win WAS REAL.
but i was playing with money won on koi princess.
there was a cheat where if you activate bonus bet, and spin until you get the 5-hit fish bonus, and immediately restart the game before stopping the symbol selector whee, your session will continue as if you had the bonus bet on (extra bonus chance) but not have to pay double for spins anymore that entire session.
even bitcasino account are welcome to confirm, did i not, have a big win on koi princess prior to my olympus REAL win?

So now you're admitting to cheating, which confirms Bitcasino's claim, but only partly, because the big win was allegedly legitimate.

This keeps getting weirder and there's even more questions to ask after this post...
Most importantly, what about the settlement? Whose part of the story is true? Because it can't be that both sides are true.
Bitcasino claims there's no settlement while you have nothing more to say on the matter?

there was no settlement. i woke up and wrote some nonsense earlier, i havent taken my pills.
But yes, i repeat on my mothers life, that dawn of olympus 171 btc from a 30 mbtc bet was 100000% legit and real.
so i *WISH* i had not previously cheated at koi princess with the discussed method above.
that is all.

Oh boy...
The entire forum was ready to eat up your claims and some hours later, here you are incriminating yourself; quite literally admitting that you're a liar and a cheat.
You're now just saying that you're not as much of a cheat as they accuse you of being. Well, sadly for you, unless the casino willingly open up their logs, there's no way to prove if your big bet was legitimate or not.
But given that vulnerabilities you exploited might have not been imminently obvious to them in the first place too, it might be that even this can not be trusted as well.

I now understand why you said anything about a settlement.
It would have been part of a wild dream to willingly submit your funds to a casino and expect the house maker to pay out.
Especially to expect them to pay out after they discovered you cheated!

You know what, even if your big bet was legit, its murky water to come to a judgment if the casino should pay out anything if they had been cheated prior. They're in possession of your initial funds and some might argue that it would be fairer for them to keep them too. And if you had made exploitative withdrawals from them before, the only logical defense they have now would be to keep any funds you had left there.