Quote from: Krislaw on Today at 10:13:41 PM

Quote from: mindrust on Today at 09:13:52 PM

Quote from: LAngel on Today at 08:29:11 PM

anyone wondering how the cheat worked, it wasnt hacking at all.
it was the koi princess slot by netent i cheated at, NOT dawn of olympus. like i said before, that 171 btc win WAS REAL.
but i was playing with money won on koi princess.
there was a cheat where if you activate bonus bet, and spin until you get the 5-hit fish bonus, and immediately restart the game before stopping the symbol selector whee, your session will continue as if you had the bonus bet on (extra bonus chance) but not have to pay double for spins anymore that entire session.
even bitcasino account are welcome to confirm, did i not, have a big win on koi princess prior to my olympus REAL win?

Daym this took me back in time when me and my buddies were trying to find game glitches this way. (trial and error)

When the game's logic gets over-complicated, there happens to be some unintended but "legit"* ways to cheat the game.

I guess what you did was similar to this. (unless you are not lying again)

*It was legit since you did not use any external tools. You only used the games faulty logic against it. (of course that doesn't mean you deserved to get paid, not legit in that way)

You're right about, if a user finds a glitch, he can use it to his own gain, and maybe get away with it if possible, the responsibility is on the website for allowing such to happen. It's just that the winning is from a user known to have used their glitches against them.
But in this case, LAngel can't allowed because he's been accused of cheating, I don't know if it's through external tools.

Quote from: mindrust on Today at 09:13:52 PM

Bitcasino painted you as a genius.

Made a TLDR version of bitcasino's post.

Quote from: Bitcasino.io Support on Today at 01:08:19 PM

...LAngel?s winnings are not legitimate and are a result of fraudulently manipulating GameArt?s Dawn of Olympus.

This is not the first encounter we?ve had with this person and this was made crystal clear when we uncovered a 100% match to a previous user
who had been investigated and subsequently blocked for tampering with games.
We use a wide array of industry-leading detection tools, 100% across them is unambiguously a match.

Previously, this user managed to extract a large amount of BTC from ourselves and also hit a few other crypto casinos in a very similar manner.
For this reason this person is widely known to ourselves, other crypto casinos and at least GameArt, if not other game providers.
...
Given the 100% match, our fraud team?s extensive findings supported by GameArt?s investigation and the history we have with this user
the account will not be unfrozen and the funds will not be paid out. There is no settlement, this is false information.
...
There are plenty of red flags that can be seen in the original thread, from the YouTube video to now being private to the very fact that the
user has been withdrawing 25BTC over the past few days - something which has already been noted by Bitcointalk members.

These parts carry some important data.

Now... who's lying?

I guess both parties aren't saying something about this whole thing.
This user's IP should have been banned since they noticed he extracted some huge amounts of BTC and also have the game providers fix the glitches.

Agreed both parties are not telling the full picture. Banning IP is useless you can also use VPNs.