Quote from: masterrex on July 18, 2020, 12:59:05 PM

Quote from: Balladtony77 on July 18, 2020, 12:06:37 PM

IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.

For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.

Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks

https://daomaker.com/dyco

I don't think so, IEO that was done on a legitimate and trusted crypto exchange is much attractive and safe compared to all kind of kinds of fundraising that exist today If your so-called DYCO method is different and unique from others why it's not yet patronized by newly established projects? it sounds odd to me, But if DYCO was truly good, safe and effective well it deserves a break to replace the previous crowdfunding methods like ICO, STO etc. that was prone to scammers.

I agree if it is truly safe and effective then it should be a good choice for all of the future projects that would like to start up.
But I think it would also be polluted when it gains too much attention just like what happened to ICO,STO,IEO etc....