Quote from: actmyname on Today at 06:52:41 PM

Quote from: arallmuus on Today at 06:46:22 PM

Quote from: actmyname on Today at 02:34:00 PM

A disclaimer would be nice.

Either something to the ends of "this is a third-party game provider and is not provably fair" or just explicitly stating that you can't verify their bets.

Every game that is provided by the 3rd party is not provably fair and it is easy to differrentiate which

Yes, but how would an unfamiliar player know that they weren't provably fair? Could easily build the association between Stake and provably fairness, rather than with Stake's original games and provably fairness.

Quote from: arallmuus on Today at 06:46:22 PM

Think of it as a brand and those huge brand ( game provider ) could possibly bring in more new player to the site

I understand this, but it still doesn't mean I can't rag on the providers for a lack of provable fairness. Just because they are reputable does not mean that they cannot cheat in some form: that would be a huge logic gap that is massively exploitable.

Not provably fair doesnt mean that the site is cheating, it just means you cant verify wether the site cheats you or not and it only works if you verify your own bets otherwise it doesnt. I doubt that majority of the player would verify their bets one by one after rolling tons with the autobet on the original stake game, do you?

I get your concern regarding this but I believe that Stake has come to a tough decision by associating the site with all these game providers that has no provably fair system built on it. By associating the site with this 3rd party provider, Stake is also exposing their own players to the possibility of being cheated however I doubt that Stake would keep silent whenever there is a case where these providers cheat their players.

Stake desperately need to attract larger pack of crowd to their site in other to survive the other competitor and to do that, it would be faster to use 3rd party provider then to code all their own game from scratch.