Quote from: HeRetiK on July 20, 2020, 05:04:01 PM

Quote from: The whole world, good nig on July 20, 2020, 04:36:19 PM

I'm a novice. I hate something,
Why not use the generic model and allow people to switch to the chips they like
2048 m BTC: change to 2btc
4096 m BTC: change to 4 BTCs
8192 m BTC: change to 8 BTCs

The rationale behind this is actually explained in the FAQ:

Quote from: https://chipmixer.com/faq

We wanted to have a lot of chip sizes and to easily split/merge them. if you start with 1 BTC and you split it, your minimal chip is 0.015625 BTC which seems even weirder.

And in case you really, really want "round" BTC chips:

Quote from: https://chipmixer.com/faq

[...] We have introduced commonize function which will swap your weird looking 1.024 BTC chip into 1 BTC chip and weird looking 0.512 BTC into 0.5 BTC.

Using this action will cost you the weird part of chip which is around 2% fee.

A fee of 2% is well within the range that is customary for mixing services.

All chips should refer to the general function, 2048 m BTC: change to 2btc. 4096 m BTC: change to 4btc. Bt8192. Let's choose more general functions. In fact, 2.4% of the cost is reasonable. If all chips use universal functions, even 5% of the cost will not care