Quote from: exstasie on Today at 09:39:19 AM

Quote from: deisik on July 26, 2020, 02:57:18 PM

CBDCs are not likely to help simple folks because helping them would come at the expense of regular bankers.

I don't buy the conspiracy theory angle. Central banks are not beholden to consumer banks. The Fed is much more concerned about preventing a depression than catering to the business model of JPMorgan Chase, for example

Well, that remains to be seen and then probably bought, the conspiracy theory part

I don't know for certain but let me guess, isn't JPMorgan Chase one of the chartered commercial banks that can elect some of the board members of the Federal Reserve regional banks? Couldn't it turn out that the Fed is now so much concerned about preventing a depression specifically because it caters to the business model of JPMorgan and its bros from Wall Street?

Quote from: exstasie on Today at 09:39:19 AM

The banks do have powerful lobbyists though. I could see them opposing this on a fundamental level. We'll see whether Congress is in their pocket or not when the time comes. The Fed and others in favor of CBDCs do have some influence, and legislators also have an interest in the potential benefits for economic stability

As far as I know, the Fed has put on hold the idea of a digital version of the dollar. So it's now your time to guess who may have already won this battle

In light of collapsing economy, JPMorgan plans to lay off several members of Congress

Quote from: bitgolden on Today at 06:46:36 PM

What really would make it difficult is that if they sell more bitcoin than they have. Right now banks have the right to loan out more money than they can and they even buy shares and stocks of companies as well, so they get only a a certain amount but basically feel like unlimited amount of loaning out and investment with a lot more money than they have

CBDCs have nothing to do with Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency, for that matter