Quote from: YOSHIE on Today at 03:02:02 AM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 01:14:09 AM

Instead of trying to gain notoriety wouldn't it be better to just pm the manager with proof? Then tag the users? And then if nothing happens make this thread?

not busting your balls, but come on man, save us some trouble.

new or old threads do not matter to me, which is a matter of PM from certain managers, who are doubtful and suspicious of certain Alt accounts that register in the campaigns they manage.

The answer for you is very simple.
Eliminate the rules that you write as below, every campaign managed by manager.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on December 04, 2017, 07:34:19 PM

1 bitcointalk account per person(If you are found to be enrolling alts you and your alt are kicked out with no pay)
No neg trust accts may enroll

And instead you write a new 'rule'...
"We accept at least 3-5 Alt accounts that register in our campaign".

And we will stop, mark Alt, publish Alt account & ignore PM from the manager, if there is an Alt account & register in a particular campaign.

Do you agree with my idea, so that we are no longer (fame) = committing crime again & arrogant.

Maybe we will work only for what rules are applied in this Bitcointalk Forum.
And ignore Alt cheating & register in the campaign.

I by no means want you to stop doing what you're doing. I want you to continue to expose these idiots. I would like to see you poost in the alts thread 1st, or make 1 thread exposing all alts yourself vs a new thread for every new connection.

Please do not take offense, I appreciate you exposing these assholes.