Quote from: dragonvslinux on Today at 04:59:03 PM

Quote from: sportsbet.io on Today at 04:30:23 PM

Quote from: dragonvsandroid on Today at 12:25:32 PM

This doesn't look good. Yet another Sportsbet.io accusation of a winner withdrawing their winnings and being accused of multi-accounting without any evidence provided Roll Eyes

Let's not forget they used to publically provide evidence of why KYC had failed, as well as evidence of multi-accounting. Now they no longer do, instead they just ignore these requests Undecided

I'm starting to wonder if they would be more responsive to scam accusations without current DT support? It's hard not to imagine they would be providing evidence to clear their name if certain flags were active against their account. There is little to no incentive for them to do this at present unfortunately.

Anyone opposing their flags better hope they are sitting on evidence. Otherwise it facilities a gambling site to refuse withdrawals of winners whenever they feel like it, just by referencing a handful of other random players. It's a dangerous precedent to be setting.

But hey, their T&C covers it right so nothing to worry about?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263445.0

Hi please be advised we appreciate account and user security and we do not wish to put the dirty laundry out in the public.

There is no doubt that there is connect between the recent "oh my god, sportsbet.io is stealing from me" and the price increase in bitcoin

I hope this is not the case here and it is a clear multi accounting issue, but lets see

regards,

Steve.
Sportsbet.io

Hi Steve, same person here, just multi-accounting Tongue

It's good to hear your response in this thread, as well as the other. I understand there would be a correction between bitcoin go up and someone got my bitcoin and I want it back, it's a valid point. I think most users (bar the accusers) are hoping there is clear evidence of multi-accounting, this would resolve the matter swiftly and definitively.

I've reached out to who I believe are "shitik88" and "rasmus15", two of the four accused as part of the multi-account ring, since a bit of dirty laundry got aired in public.
Reference: https://prnt.sc/tqgx4g fom https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265366.msg54893612#msg54893612

Given the unique enough usernames and from a quick google search, I think it's fair to assume they are these individuals:
shitik88: https://www.instagram.com/shitik88 & https://www.youtube.com/user/shitik88
rasmus15: https://www.instagram.com/rasmus15/, https://github.com/Rasmus15 & https://soundcloud.com/rasmus15
as well as possibly newer accounts https://www.instagram.com/rasmus15.11/, https://www.tiktok.com/@rasmus15.11 & https://urlebird.com/user/rasmus15.11/

I've messaged them both via Instagram, in the hope they will respond and out of courtesy. I didn't bother with the other two referenced accounts, as the names appear too generic. shitik88 uploaded a photo 2 days ago, but rasmus15 hasn't for years. I realise it's a stab in dark here, but can't imagine there are too many rasmus' that desire no.15 after their usernames. or shitik's that chose 88, but could be wrong. At least a quick search doesn't appear to prove otherwise...

Hmm.. fair play!

Ill check this out,

thank you.

regards,

Steve,
Sportbet.io