Quote from: suchmoon on July 30, 2020, 11:08:26 PM

I don't have a problem with comments and opinions. I would have a problem with someone saying e.g. "This proves that Sportsbet are scammers" or "neymarjr12 scammed Sportsbet" after mediation. That's like presenting fake proof that Steamtyme scammed suchmoon.

That is having a problem with peoples opinions which they comment after they draw conclusions from the findings/ruling of this arbitration.
We can't change the way people think or perceive this outcome. Either way once a decision is reached people will view someone as a bad actor and will likely speak out about it. That or they will go around tagging accounts if thy feel strongly enough about it.

Wait wait wait why am I the scammer. I have nice things... maybe you wanted my, um okay never mind. In this case though if we went to arbitration over say me shorting you some satoshis, b/c we didn't agree who covers fees. This goes to an arbitrator and they decide I was being a dick and trying to short you. People have every right to tell me how shitty I am, or to say they disagree with the ruling. Their opinion and voicing it shouldn't carry the threat of being negatively tagged. You may want to note how they viewed the case as their opinions don't align with your and tag them neutrally. The note is there but there is no punishment for an opinion and a comment.

See below where if it escalates, it could possibly enter the realm of acceptable.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 03:03:15 AM

The exact criteria for a red tag comes down to this:

Quote

You think that trading with this person is high-risk.

No it comes down to this.

Quote from: theymos on January 30, 2020, 09:13:15 PM

The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.
~snip~
- Leave negative ratings if you actively think that trading with the person is less safe than with a random person.
- Unstable behavior could very occasionally be an acceptable reason for leaving negative trust, but if it looks like you're leaving negative trust due to personal disagreements, then that's inappropriate. Ratings are not for popularity contests, virtue signalling, punishing people for your idea of wrongthink, etc.

I would not consider drawing conclusions from the ruling of an arbitrated dispute to be unstable behavior. So again unless these posters are simultaneously acting in bad faith regarding Trades/Services, I advocate for neutral tags to note opinions on their behavior/opinions/posts.

That or we could start tagging people for typos and grammar. They could mess up the terms which makes them a risk to trade with.

That's my piece and the more I wrote I feel I needed to end it with this. I try not to tell people how to do things and seem to be having a harder time of it lately. This is my opinion, take it for that. It's your feedback use it as you will, but there are guidelines.