Quote from: Damelon on March 03, 2014, 10:11:48 PM

Quote from: mikesbmw on March 03, 2014, 10:00:10 PM

Hmmm, okay, that's a pity then about the nextcrypto.org site...

We differ on the "that's also okay" part Cheesy

Of course it's all open source, everyone can design whatever they want and do whatever they wish.
BUT: for the "official" (paid for by the community) branding we need uniformity and stick to it.

Is nxt.org ours? If so, that would really need to be a top notch designed website (through and through). All other official advertising should be based on the the same style and color schemes.

I also think that we should be tougher as to who receives what bounty and if they receive any bounty, we should also be allowed to change stuff and influence the look and feel. We are, after all, paying for it!

I am a firm believer that if my guys and I do a good job, it will be adopted. We are doing at least two styles to appeal to different groups and circumstances.

nxt.org is privately owned, so no, not ours.

My strategy with the branding guys is a relatively small bounty (30,000) for the work, but they then hodl Nxt, which will give them a reason to keep developing.
If not, we have all material and can work from that.

Mind you, it needs to be a total package, or there will be no payment at all.

I already like what I am seeing (regarding the design you posted)!

Thought so about nxt.org. Still sucks. They wanted to much money eh? Sad

Think it came by in the main thread.

I wasn't referring to you about being more strict with bounties. Grin

That's more of a general remark. If we pay for it, we get a say in it, otherwise: good luck! Wink

So about Amsterdam: what do we need and what do we already have?