Quote from: Dabs on Today at 01:23:31 PM

Don't forget that FLUX started from zero, and DAM started below 0.01 in USD or equivalent. Oh, I'm sure you know about it having ran 2 masternodes on the old chain.

FLUX is down 99.7 from ATH (https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/flux) and looks to have started at about $50.00

DAM started at 0 because 100% of it was created in a token generation event.

I know you’re in this deep and - reasonably - are biased toward the project. Just like I was biased to the old chain because I was in it deep. Take 3 steps back re-evaluate the project with fresh eyes. Truly ask yourself what market utility it provides.

Dig deep on the fundamental problems they’re trying to solve. “create a dynamic market equilibrium using realtime on-chain supply and demand“ sounds good as words... I guess (??)... but don’t markers create equilibrium, not projects? Isn’t there already “a dynamic market equilibrium using realtime on-chain supply and demand” for BTC trading pairs? ETH trading pairs? USDT/USDC trading pairs?

If there’s no real underlying utility solution being delivered by this project it is on a trajectory to 0. I tried to bring that up at the beginning of this month and got banned for it. That should tell you something. Everything I tried to warn you of is coming to pass, yet you’re still entrenched? Evaluate your bias.