Quote from: Protagonus on March 04, 2014, 01:11:45 AM

Quote from: skribnod on March 04, 2014, 12:57:17 AM

My interpetation of what Bumface is saying:

"yes, it would be nice to be on cryptsy, but untill the coin is doing well and growing for itself, it will not be on cryptsy"

Which then brings me to the point of....why would we need cryptsy if the coin was doing well enough on its own?

Correct me if I'm wrong please.

I wonder also if there was a conversation similar to this:

Bumface: @bigvern, we have a new coin that we would like to have listed on Cryptsy.
Vern: @bumface, would you be willing to spend some BTC to get it listed fast?
Bumface: @bigver, no I'd rather not, I don't believe in paying to be listed.
Vern: @bumface, We'll if there's enough community support on the forum then I can add it.

This "could" produce answers similar to what we've seen from Bumface, I suppose. He can only repeat what Vern said in that case.

*On the stuff with a market. I'm not sure what Doge has done; but payment processing is the hardest part of a retail store utilizing any crypto. Any store that uses BTC goes via coinbase, not an exchange. We may first need a licensed payment processor.

*Some of the utility complaints we have here, still apply to LTC after 2 years though. No place to spend, no payment processors, etc. However, I'm with DCgirl in more promoting Crypto's as a store of value for a general function.

*I can also give some tips for FB promotion in another post here soon; if people want. I don't do FB, but was pretty involved with it a few years back. Never done twitter though. With FB, I'm pretty familiar on how to get friends, support pages; etc. as I used to assist in Dev and design concepts for a couple games there.

*I wish I could to more programing / coding stuff; but that's not my forte. I've always been paid as a research engineer. Heh, I normally get paid for ideas; the stuff hated so much 'round here Grin

A fellow research engineering comrade. What area?