Quote from: gmaxwell on August 06, 2020, 03:37:35 AM

Quote from: RHavar on August 06, 2020, 02:36:58 AM

Except "batch on replacement" is ludicrously hard to do.

That's why I say they should batch in the first place.

Quote

I actually think it's the hardest (pure) programming problem I've worked on, and don't feel like I'd even be able to do it given another 6 months. I've never done "logic programming" but I almost feel like something like that would be essential, where you sort of logically describe all the high level concepts and ask it to solve what you should do. As just trying to handle all the cases imperatively just seems impossible to not end up in an exploded spaghetti nightmare of a gazillion states.
[Bit off topic, just ranting here incase you have any insights]

That was all I had to offer. I think the right way to solve that isn't to write code for it, it's to write (or steal) a logic-relation engine.

In particular handling all the cases were an earlier partial payment confirms, and then making sure that your follwup payment conflicts with the earlier complete payments (either by being a child of the partial or more directly) ... just a gnarly mess.

For most people the best advise right now is batch in the first place.

@RHavar may I see what you have tried? I'm interested in this subject. My name for it was "dynamic batching".