Quote from: buwaytress on August 08, 2020, 12:54:24 PM

The UNIC one, really. Don't look any further, at least not until one of the other Top 200 unis (or whatever QE similar list you might want to believe in) completes a full curriculum (some Ivy Leagues offer a course or two but none a full programme). I've had contact with the people from there too and they're proper =)

Those employers already in blockchain already view UNIC as legitimate and, as far as educators go, there aren't any better than Antonoupoulos. They also have a sample course you can start for free already to get a taste of what it's like. UNIC isn't a ranked place, but their MSc is and will be the benchmark for many years to come.

Personally, I've despised the way employers still insist on ranked accreditations, and I'm en route to completing a Master's just to get better job prospects, reluctantly paying a lot of money to get a degree from a "ranked" place... so I know where you're coming from and why the need to get something that employers will look at.

It's one thing to fight the system, but we all gotta eat. Good luck!

This is funny. I have someone that's messaged me privately and has asked to remain confidential telling me the exact opposite.

I like UNIC as it has the first mover's advantage so I resonate with your thinking that it will be the standard which others are compared to simply because it was the first in the space.

I also think people are understating the fact that Andreas is one of the speakers - that alone would be resume worthy.

Indeed we do all gotta eat.

I do want to remain in Korea likely - if you read what they're doing with the Digital New Deal, you'd understand why.

The one from Kentucky is a contender I did see but it's a bit expensive and not well recognized me thinks.

Perhaps I'll go onto LinkedIn and talk to UNIC alumni.