Quote from: anunnaki1202 on Today at 01:45:36 PM

I would share it but need 1 BTC

Since I missed the fun on 2010 suppose is lots of sharks here with thousands of coins just doing nothing and helping no one.

I expect lots of hate replies because of this.

LOL hate is a strong word, but I do regret giving you a merit point Embarrassed

The problem is that now I question you even have the real code and even if it isn't a fake it isn't like some rare beanie baby to auction off.

Let's see exactly what you claim to have (BTW this 'fun' was in 2009 not 2010):
Bitcoin v0.1[.0] released JANUARY 9, 2009 SATOSHI NAKAMOTO CRYPTOGRAPHY MAILING LIST
Download link: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bitcoin/bitcoin-0.1.0.rar
[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.2 now available JANUARY 11, 2009 SATOSHI NAKAMOTO SOURCEFORGE MAILING LIST
Bitcoin v0.1.2 is now available for download.

So looks like alpha v.0.1.1 lasted maybe 1 day. The code delta between those two versions will indicate what it might included (for what that is worth since so short lived), but likely just this:

Quote

From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshi@vistomail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Crash in bitcoin 0.1.0
To: hal.finney@gmail.com
I isolated the problem. If I spawn a thread and do mapAddresses.count, even as the very first thing in the program, it segfaults. The workaround is to needlessly call mapAddresses.count in the main thread once and it's fine from then on. I hate to blame the compiler, and I've never had a GCC compiler bug before, but this feels like one. Maybe some bit of init code it tries to optimize out if it's not called at least once in the same thread, or some STL optimization that's not thread friendly. I'm really dismayed to have this botch up the release after all that stress testing. The attached file: bitcoin-0.1.1.rar is the version where I deleted the mapAddresses.count line

good luck finding a 'buyer' Roll Eyes