Quote from: adam0991 on Today at 10:33:49 AM

The reason for supporting the flag was so that PlayerX could get the answers from sportsbet they wanted and for sportsbet to take the case seriously, that’s what they were asking for help to do. Had sportsbet supplies answers then I would have removed the flag. The flag helps them take it seriously. Nothing more.

That's not what type 2/3 flags are for. To support a flag that claims a contract violation occurred there needs to be a referenced thread that shows the proof of the contract and the violation.

Quote from: actmyname on Today at 10:38:17 AM

it's no fault of yours that you were mistaken about the mechanics and intent of it

It kind of is. The flags are very carefully worded if people cared to read before clicking buttons:

Quote

You are supporting the following, affirming that it is true to the best of your knowledge:
sportsbet.io violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. sportsbet.io did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2020. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Nowhere does it say "support this if you want to send sportsbet.io a message".