Quote from: Script3d on Today at 10:46:32 AM

Quote from: Jeger.Kiting on Today at 10:28:04 AM

I think if a new project still uses an ICO to help develop its project there is no problem, at least there is good trust for investors and the public so that they can believe in the ICO they are running ..

Indeed, we know that ICOs have been in use in recent years by systems run by new projects, and have turned to IEOs that have very good confidence in the interests of investors and the public, but is there anything better than ICO / IEO for a fairer system and good for the project itself or investors and the community ??

There's STO out there which is regulated, that means the investor can trust the project, but im not hearing any development from STO coins or news, i heard STO projects have a hard time selling which is why you don't get to hear STO. I guess the best form of crowdfunding right now is IEO because of the guaranteed exchange and public trust.

Therefore I ask and find out which is better than that, so everyone chooses IEO instead of STO or ICO because the IEO we know is guaranteed in the Exchange itself, but there are also those who don't use all three but they are successful, so actually This depends on whether the project itself is consistent or not and the development team is very good at implementing what is needed by the public and investors.