Quote from: ranochigo on August 22, 2020, 01:40:08 PM

Quote from: DigitalMonster on August 22, 2020, 09:07:25 AM

02000000000101a7fe8ba463c9cd400097220533d7c81b02a0104e3a760c4bbb933eaa9ebdedaf0 000000000fdffffff0162d8010000000000160014dadcd7f1cd1b11c3a69f61585f003395ec8a99 550400473044022056b0b1deb00b4f2a798623849655316b2b8cb35fb5607a162fd6cdc5b235165 702203395c5e20e5425a2eacab3c827e44083eb3fdd05398dd2213a23b551db7127680147304402 2065c5deee5467bdbcceb7974effd5ef02e62c57f75e0c7b3a085027351254c5fe022047a8caf51 45052d8f3c54d1f1d829b14cb566a0f7beba2a3dbea9a0a283cfed701475221024d34631e9abc48 8b9a9d137bc91746415acbadbe42b5122a83d514f7cf1f11482103608484ccf6e229ee06d3358c5 49e458c5a2d8c56e8b9eaa89413e3509593fdb652aeafd50900

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1stpCM-xB6DAi54OhztbHYaNs8P_2bhx4/view?usp=sharing and here the transaction is a format Electrum

I looked at the transaction that you're trying to replace. It doesn't have enough incremental fee.

The reference node requires that the new transaction to pay an additional fee (amounting to a network relay fee) to the previous transaction. Failing which, the reference node will refuse to relay the transaction resulting in a poor propagation. Try paying an additional 0.00000073BTC.

Can you imagine, now I went to see the answers here, and found that the transaction that I could not broadcast this one above, had logged 244 blocks back to the blockchain successfully. this is nonsense, it turns out Electrum or there on the site one of them did it.