Re: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed
Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.
Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
In addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.
Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.
Archived: http://archive.is/MEOGwIn addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.
Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.
Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko
BUMP!
This is a crystal clear case of plagiarism. Why isnt this account nuked or at least got a two year signatur ban?
- plagiarism
- account changed has several times in the past (check the different languages and the posting gaps)
- talking about merits in almost every post
- bad post quality, meaningless posts, use a translator if you cant read it...
Other users got banned/temp banned for way less than that.
-cut-
And I thought it was off the table...
-Translated from my Statement in the german local section- see below!
First of all: I admit to having made a mistake, especially with regard to the reference to my sources.
But I have to make it clear that I did not get anything from these sources, which were discussed in the accusation against me.
About 1 year ago, I did a 'project work' in the context of a further education, in which I talked about the future of logistics and the possibilities to make it more efficient.
I also have to say that it was not expected from our lecturer that we would give sources. (Which should not be an excuse for this anyway!)
Of course I used different sources. I was especially interested in the topic of block chain in the interaction of different possible scenarios and processes in logistics.
For this purpose I also briefly dealt with legal issues and read an article by Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer, which deals with this topic in detail, and used it for my project work:
Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer:
https://www.unilu.ch/fakultaeten/rf/professuren/furrer-andreas/
Article:
https://jusletter.weblaw.ch/fr/dam/publicationsystem/articles/jusletter/2017/917/der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df/Jusletter_der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df_fr.pdf
As already mentioned I may have taken over too much content without marking it.
That was my mistake and that will certainly not happen again...
It's just a pity that I'm not addressed personally (not even parallel to the public accusation) in order to be able to correct misunderstandings, possible mistakes or misfortunes.
I must honestly say that I'm a little perplexed!
A forum ban would be sad, but also no end of my life...
In my case I see a small difference to real copy and paste plagiarism. But maybe I just want to see that!
But okay if you are so determined to fight against such practices, I can understand that, because there is a lot going wrong in this direction.
I can only sincerely apologize for this and in the future I can better point out possible sources!
Everything else is not in my hands...
Best regards
SiNeReiNZzz
PS: Should this be my last mail and I get banned, I still wish you all a pleasant and successful time.