Quote from: nutildah on September 02, 2020, 08:52:23 PM

Quote from: M-BTC on September 02, 2020, 09:41:52 AM

Quote from: nutildah on September 02, 2020, 12:21:28 AM

Quote from: M-BTC on September 01, 2020, 02:33:16 PM

Depositing and withdrawing funds, without making trades, is a huge AML red flag. Exchanges are basically huge mixers. If you deposit funds into an exchange and withdraw those funds there is no way to trace where the funds are going.

Not a valid excuse to hold somebody's funds without any sort of way to get them back. Exchanges are only decent mixers if they are completely anonymous, like a DEX, and even then there's ways to see who got what, where its been, and where its going. Exchanges that ask for KYC are the exact opposite of mixers.

And of course there's a way to trace where the funds are going, its called blockchain analytics.

It is a valid excuse to hold the funds (according to AML/CFT policies). Chain analysis can't link deposits and withdrawals on exchanges without contacting the exchanges and having them provide the information. This is why similar actions (depositing and withdrawing without making trades) are flagged and will result in having to provide KYC information, as it is a money laundering indication. Exchanges have no other option than to follow the AML/CFT regimes.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not giving my personal opinion here but this is how these policies work. Regulations will only get worse from here. I wouldn't be surprised if they already reported OP's transaction(s) to local authorities (if they know what country he's from).

A "money laundering indication" is not the same thing as money laundering. You do understand that right? What would they report him for what exactly?

Because that is how AML policies work. You're guilty until proven innocent, not the other way around. Exchanges/financial institutions are obliged to report suspicious transactions. Local authorities will determine if they want to do a follow-up investigation or not.