Quote from: BitcoinFX on September 10, 2020, 05:27:06 PM

Quote from: BitcoinFX on September 10, 2020, 05:20:55 PM

Quote from: Do_zzze on September 10, 2020, 11:47:04 AM

Note that BSV has been deployed for almost 2 years.

That sounds to me like an admission that BSV was not deployed on 3 January 2009. Unless my maths be off a bit. Perhaps I should ask Dr. Faketoshi for arithmetical assistance; I hear that he is some sort of a genius.

Quote from: suchmoon on September 30, 2020, 01:44:30 PM

What do I need to do to get sued by faketoshi?

Provoke his attorneys in some personally humiliating way that underscores their own helplessness. It is more likely to incite a disproportionate response. Think on the same psychological principle as ridiculing the lawyers’ penis sizes, but classier.

Speaking from experience that I will not dox here—a stereotypical lawyer who feels humiliated by you, especially from a challenge seen by others, will take up the cause with all the obsessiveness of Captain Ahab, and all the refined gracefulness of a toddler throwing a tantrum.

If I had more free time, I might try something like the below on the Faketoshi legal team. Combined with a statement on Faketoshi’s crimes, and my judgment of his character. Just for the amusement of watching them send subpoenas to Tor exit nodes.

Quote from: nullius on September 20, 2020, 09:29:53 PM

LOL. Bragging about a legal warchest on a cypherpunk forum founded by a Tor user who invented a new form of permissionless money.

Few affronts are as frustrating to a man as demonstrating to him the limits of his own power.

I suspect that in large part, this is why Faketoshi and his clique tend to froth at the mouth against anonymity: Their litigious lawyers are powerless to terrorize people who cannot be located.

Mr Bear, I can’t speak for anybody else, but I have some news for my own part: Your legal “war chest” is a contemptible joke, insofar as I am concerned. I am above your corrupt laws, and untouchable to your corrupt courts.

Quote from: nullius on January 21, 2020, 11:02:45 PM

[Mine] is the anarchy of the good who, being good, hold fast to honour out of pride: For the most sincere morality is the self-glorification of the proud, whose judgments of others honour the best of what they see in themselves. It is they who would embrace death before the self-negation of dishonour—not as a sacrifice, but as a supreme act of pure selfishness...

Free yourself first from the moral authority of the mob. You owe nothing to mass opinion; therefore, the laws which rise on mass opinion have no proper authority over you. You do not consent to be governed by the votes of millions of anthropoid livestock who want to be bound in chains—who eagerly embrace those chains just as long as they remain warm, fed, and adequately entertained. You are a law unto yourself.

Wherefore “anarchy” as to the masses and their so-called “governments”, which are in truth no more than the largest, most well-armed organized criminal gangs. Don’t reject authority: Be your own authority.

Rankles a bit, does it not. The rattling of blunt sabres doth not impress.

Protip: It is inadvisable to try this with anyone who has access to classified national intelligence agency resources, etc., etc.