Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 04:38:13 PM

Quote from: aesma on Today at 01:28:55 PM

If/when I am rich screwing a few girls like that would be nice for sure, but I don't want to live with a gold digger.

Of course not. None of us would want to settle down with any kind of girl like that. Surely, it wouldn't be good.

I must point out that the only rational reason for a man to invest long-term in an intimate relationship with a woman is for the production of suitable heirs. Anything else can be had most optimally on a short- or medium-term basis.

Of course, many men behave with an effeminate irrationality; and the whole concept of marriage has been destroyed, inasmuch as it has come to be based on so-called love, i.e. an emotional codependency of narcissists who produce children in the manner of buying fashion accessories (and then wonder why the brats grow up to be ungrateful losers). Marriage is a reproductive relationshipnot about you, not about her, not about your egos and your lovecertainly not just about sex and good feelings, which can be obtained on an hourly rate schedule. Indeed, if you can pay at least $5001000/hour (the skys the limit), then you can hire not only sex, but also charming companionship, social poise, and even a bit of intellect.

There are some things money cant buysuch as someone to whom to leave your money.

Otherwise, plan your liquidation phase such that hookers get all of your money before you die. Your life will sum to zero, and you will be quickly forgotten: Genetically forgotten, memetically forgotten, extinguished body and soul as if you had never existed. Meanwhile, have fun! :-)

N.b. that for the aforestated purpose, you do want a beautiful woman. Darwin can help explain whyor you may ask a dog breeder about the requirements if you want to avoid having degenerate, ugly pups. Beauty is not skin-deep, after all; and the desire therefor is anything but shallow.

Catching up, bit by bit...

Quote from: Last of the V8s on Today at 05:51:02 AM

is this a hint that you are gunning for a hat? because there are hoops that must be gone through and hurdles that must be cleared to gain such an accolade
bases that must be covered

No, thanks; I remain an incorrigible no-hatter. Whereas I apparently overestimated the troll crowds literary acumen: I presumed the term corrupt cap wearer to be a botched reference to Albrecht Gessler in the story of William Tell, or something of that nature. I didnt associate it with WO hats; if I didnt misinterpret some of their incoherent gibberish (as may be possible), I think that I saw trolls tossing it at Lauda as well as myself. Whoops.