Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 02:58:07 PM

Don't you know that guys like SwayStar make money no matter what? Even if there was only some kind of small window, they some how figure out how to retroactively disclose how they had made money in order that our confidence is inspired in them.

Delightful, Sway! Posted after I wrote the below, as I was gathering other sundry replies:

Quote from: SwayStar123 on Today at 03:44:24 PM

its just +EV gambling in a sense, its not that dangerous if you know how to manage risk

I have a casino gambling script that is an EXTREME AUTOMATED PROFIT GENERATOR, if^[1] you can predict the outcome of bets only 2% better than random chance!

I offer to sell it to you for only 1.2 BTC. PM me if you want to make money^[2] fast.

1. Focus on the IF!
2. For me.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 02:58:07 PM

38,250 total acquired BTC / 21,000,000 total supply BTC = .182143 % of total BTC supply

Quote from: fillippone on Today at 03:38:40 PM

Regarding the math, my favourite is:

38,250/18,479,537.5=0.2069857%

More than 0.2% of total current supply!

Interesting. I myself measure my holdings in proportionate terms of total supplyboth maximum and current. I wonder how many people do thatprobably not many.

Quote from: Last of the V8s on Today at 03:39:33 PM

Chaum did go way off the rails with his previous shitcoin, elixir or something. This would need to be whole rafts better, and it's low on my todo list.

Elixxir (stupid cute spelling, yes) is now part of xx network, according to the porn-blocked website.

I would hope that Chaum learned something about the dangers of centralization from his prior experience. Satoshi solved the problem that killed Chaums Digicash; whereas IMO, Bitcoins major flaw is its lack of anonymous, unlinkable transactions, which Digicash had a quarter-century ago and Chaums eCash design had in the 1970s. Thus my curiosity about this. I have not yet reviewed itthis is not an endorsement.