Quote from: johhnyUA on Today at 09:37:42 AM

You are free to show another examples of me, "brining up Lauda". I think you 're confusing me with someone else. I just showed another example of correct use of trust rating (yes, i consider liars as a high risk for trade, especially if they're lying about someone else reputation).

Lauda's use of the trust system in such cases is sometimes incorrect and not a good example to rely on. I didn't say you've brought up Lauda before... just that you're unable to justify your trust rating on its own and have to resort to fallacies and rationalizations. Probably a good sign that the rating is questionable.

Quote from: johhnyUA on Today at 09:37:42 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on September 16, 2020, 06:51:29 PM

Didn't you also tag marlboroza at one point for some idiotic reasons?

no, that was Vadi2323. His feedback is still active, tho. But i'm not not surprised that you still confusing people.

My apologies. It was not a trust rating, you sent a PM to marlboroza insulting his ancestors. Not cool but not trust system abuse.

Quote from: johhnyUA on Today at 09:37:42 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on September 16, 2020, 06:51:29 PM

Like red trust for disrespecting the law. If you can't reflect on your own actions... well, I still think you deserve bob123's leniency but your blow-up high horse is leaking badly.

Can you please bring correct quote where i'm telling that neg for lying and neg for "disrespecting the law" is different things?

Not sure why we'd need such a quote. I consider your sent trust ratings invalid and retaliatory for the reasons I already explained. I consider bob123's rating on you unnecessary for the reasons I already explained. Why do I need to find your quote to show my opinion? Doesn't make sense.

Quote from: johhnyUA on Today at 09:37:42 AM

And in my response for you, i clarified the reason why i left feedback for lying. How do you find out that i think that both feedbacks are different? In fact, they're pretty the same in meaning that someone left red trust for behaviors which he can't accept and consider as shady.

Besides, It's not the first time when you juggling your opponent quotes and senses behind it in some weird manner (at least in my view)

So bob123 should leave his rating in place? It really hard to figure out what you're saying when you keep talking in riddles and demanding that others prove your points.