Quote from: mersal on Today at 10:11:22 AM

Quote from: JSRAW on Today at 07:56:10 AM

Quote from: Tipstar on September 17, 2020, 01:53:17 PM

Quote from: JSRAW on September 17, 2020, 01:08:56 PM

~snip~

~edited out~
.
Though I still wish they'd spend more on developing and spreading cricket around the world, but it's their choice, people can live without cricket.

If ICC is serious about spreading the cricket world wide then they should introduce 24 team world cup tournament for ODI and T-20 instead of 10-12 teams but no they are not interested as they don't want to repeat 2007 like scenario.

BCCI don't want to distribute the revenue further with more teams and that is the reason why Cricket was not included into the Olympics as well when all other boards are okay to accept it.If the system goes like this for few more years then next generation may not much interested with watching cricket.

BCCI does not distribute the revenue it is done by ICC and already BCCI is paying more and getting less with the new revenue system in place.

The question is if BCCI is able to generate that kind of revenue why cannot other boards do the same? If other boards have issue in generating revenue why blame BCCI for everything.