Quote from: Eliovp on Today at 12:05:40 PM

Quote from: Metroid on September 17, 2020, 08:42:16 PM

Quote from: wOvAN on September 17, 2020, 08:04:48 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRxlTxysbQk

95mh - 240w

Thanks for the video. I wonder how safe is 800+ memory overclock. So without any drastic change, 2.52 watts per megahash, incredible, certainly the gpu king of mining for now.

Been reading some posts here, mostly reading a bunch of nonsense and speculation, usually not worth replying to but this one I just had to reply to.

2.52w the king of mining?

My almost 2 year old R7: 2.1W/Mh.
My 3 year old Vega 56: 2.5W/Mh (and this can be improved)
My 5700: 2.2W/Mh

Great king you've got there.

Is it a king for gaming purposes? Yeah, most probably! But so far, not for mining (efficiency wise).

Please try to be objective and don't let your fanboyism get the better of you.

Cheers ;-)

"certainly the gpu king of mining for now." Is that really wrong? Do the numbers say I said bs? Is there a better GPU right now regarding efficiency and density?

Fanboyism, really? Do the numbers say is really fanboyism? on the contrary, the numbers support my statement, tell me a gpu that does 95 mhs and uses 240 watts and yes it can be improved it too. As per my post I clearly said efficiency and density here. See how i did not need to lower to your level. There is no need to attack the poster when the numbers clearly say it all.