N.b. that this is theocrasy (not a typo!), not an historical statement at all; I will nonetheless address it historically:

Quote from: Paashaas on Today at 08:11:12 PM

Jezus, Moses, Allha, Shiva, Brahma and Vishnu where all students to give uss a head-start and left.

Jesus and Moses are fictional characters. Such can be said because they are alleged to have been historically extant human beings; and the Biblical alleged histories are bunk, just fiction (although they may be in part based very roughly on composites of bits and pieces of historical events).

In particular, I am amazed that anybody after the late 19c./early 20c. treats Jesus as having any more reality than the Wizard of Oz. The Gospels are historically prepostrous. Josephus was a liar generally, as can be readily demonstrated on many points (not only relevant to this issue). Roman historical sources contemporaneous to, or soon after the alleged life of Jesus contain absolutely nothing about corroborates the story; biased scholars are left hanging onto some old chestnut about Tacitus and Chrestus, a misinterpretation that is completely absurd to anyone with even the slightest knowledge of the matter. Etc... Moreover, there is no reliable evidence that Christians (i.e. followers of Jesus) existed before the Second Century.

The others whom you listed are wholly mystical beings, not susceptible to scientific examination or other rational scholarship. It is, strictly speaking, not irrational to believe in the existence of such beings somewhere that mere mortals (and their scientific instruments) cannot see.

The alleged historicity of Jesus was actually what I was thinking of specifically, when I wrote this:

Quote from: nullius on September 19, 2020, 01:45:16 PM

Quote from: Paashaas on September 18, 2020, 07:13:30 PM

I love history it gets really crazy the more i search.

Most of what you think you know about history is wrong.

Thats not personal. It is just a general observation. Most of what people believe to be history is fake news, either twisted or just made up by somebody with an agenda somewhere along the linethe Bible being only the worst and most notorious example. Indeed, if you want a neat demonstration of just how bad the problem is, peruse the idiot-bait on Wikipedia and follow the verifiable citations to so-called scholars who crank out arrant nonsense supporting or investigating the historicity of completely fictional stories.

Quote from: Paashaas on Today at 08:11:12 PM

Hinduism (Shiva as supreme being within Shaivism) is the world's oldest religion and Boedha are the most still intact.

Not intact in the least.

Many if not most of the modern sects of the Hindus are almost unrecognizable compared even to the diverse syncretisms of the Hindu Golden Age, let alone the religion of Vedic times.

The oldest religion would probably be something from prehistorical timestherefore perforce unknown. I need not reach the question of which religion has the oldest historically or archaeologically attested tradition.

Gautama expressed an atheistic philosophy, eerily similar to Schopenhauers World as Will. His Nirvana had the same objective as Schopenhauers Renunciation. All of the Buddhist mysticism was piled on later, after the historical Gautama. Such a thing could conceivably also happen over the course of future centuries to Schopenhauer and his quasi-mystical palingenesis of the Will, which can only be escaped by renouncing all desires and attaining the state of Nirvana, i.e. nonexistence. (Sanskrit nirvāṇa = extinguished, literally blown out in the sense of a candle.)

Obligatory at this juncture:

Quote from: Nietzsche (The Antichrist, Aphorism 42)

For this remains [] the essential difference between the two religions of decadence: Buddhism promises nothing, but actually fulfills; Christianity promises everything, but fulfills nothing.

Parenthetically, I must remark that Gautama and Schopenhauer are correct: Life inevitably has more suffering than joy. People with an inner vitality must fight every day for a few precious joys amidst many sorrows. Decadent people tire of this, and thus seek escape. The desired escape can be rational and realistic as Gautama and Schopenhauer, or an irrational escapist fantasy, such as the Christian heaven or the transhumanist Singularity.

I have no desire to discuss this now at length; and I have avoided this general line of discussion for want of time even to parse it. Dashing this off in haste, I simply call out a few points well known to me, which happened to have caught my eye as I skim down to try to catch up with what must be the fastest-moving forum thread in the world.

Quote from: JSRAW on September 22, 2020, 04:05:13 PM

(Although bit weak on south Asian/Indian subcontinent history, may be you didn't expressed yourself much and i avoid correcting peeps on interweb)

Id be pleased for some pointers on the Lokāyaka. ;-)

(I appreciated that your post, and did not intend to ignore it. If were to I answer the question that you thereby asked, I should do so properly; but I have (as yet?) lacked both the time and the inclination for such a discussion heresorry. It also invokes the problem that I keep my reading list private; indeed, I use Tor to help assure that nobody can track what I am reading.)