Quote from: mezzaluna on Today at 06:46:59 PM

Quote from: Miaallen on September 27, 2020, 01:58:41 AM

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

That is currently what is happening to most Alternate Coins and that is why I really got lucky to have a weekly signature campaign.

These developers would just create a hyped situation in which they consider their Alternate Coin to gain profit and have these maximum value but when they achieve their profits in the middle of campaigns, they stop developing their projects which really sucks and would really be a scar to people who are enthusiastic with campaigning.

Bounty hunters are not worth it to be treated like this and this is the reason why they are free to choose the campaign they think has high potentials to succeed. If the project will just run like this, bounty hunters are also free to stay or leave. Because we can do nothing about this once the bounty campaign rules is already fixed and established by its project developer.