Quote from: poolwaffle on March 05, 2014, 05:19:08 PM

Quote from: Acrobat on March 05, 2014, 05:13:59 PM

Quote from: cloudrck on March 05, 2014, 02:47:05 PM

Quote from: Acrobat on March 05, 2014, 01:06:28 PM

Well done Waffle, you've raped and killed Auroracoin yesterday and the few days before. It's dead for now...and I'm sure you'll blame it entirely on the coin. Undecided

If a coin that is made to be mined, is destroyed by said mining, then that coin was poorly written and didn't deserve to be around. There are enough shitcoins floating around without any innovation and are no more than copy/paste's of other coins that suffered the same fate.

Sigh, I'm not going to explain. Read this for example: http://coinshift.com/about/

Oddly enough, you could also claim that it was destroyed by someone spiking prices on exchanges, making people very excited about it, drawing them in to mining it, and then prices dropping drastically, turning people away from it. Or you could call these things market forces. Or you can blame it all on us. Its really completely up to you.

Your coin choosing algorithms are a bit simple then if they are affected so much by pumps. Undecided

Since you wrecked the coin and need at least 103 confirms before you can trade the coins I'm happy to see you're not going to make much money out of it anyway. Since wrecking the coin, prices are down as well. Block times are high since you left the remaining miners at a very high difficulty, high enough for them to walk away, so you're probably no where near those 103 confirms yet. For once I hope prices will drop further so you'll be left with worthless coins and maybe learn something out of it.

Why don't you divide your 25GH/s hashing power a bit over multiple coins that can handle the load so your coin raping becomes a bit more sustainable? If you don't your 'clients' will keep seeing lowering BTC/MH/day numbers everyday then I guess they'll go back to dedicated mining the coins they themselves believe in or stop mining in any way. Coin profit switching pools like Middlecoin, of which Wafflepool and Cleverming are identical copies are so 1.0, we need a 2.0 version of these types of pools and fortunately they're beginning to surface.