Quote from: TheBeardedBaby on Today at 06:30:00 AM

Quote from: YOSHIE on Today at 01:16:17 AM

Quote from: examplens on October 05, 2020, 06:18:29 PM

@JollyGood you need to revise this feedback

I think there is no point in revising or doing anything with @Amel anymore.

He's left the forum for good: Amel (Archived),
unless there is a miracle.

@Amel: Have a nice day out there.

It really doesn't matter if the account is banned or not but the negative feedback should be revised. As everyone else said, this is inappropriate use of the trust/feedback system. I'm not talking about if the user is a spammer or not, the right approach was already followed since the account is banned, and that was what should have been done at the first place. Hope that @JollyGood will avoid doing this in the future.

Exactly, I am guided by the first post in the thread where OP started a discussion about correct/incorrect red tag. Is no matter is it about Amel or someone else.

Quote from: eddie13 on Today at 02:00:33 PM

Quote from: Lucius on Today at 10:40:44 AM

Quote from: TheUltraElite on Today at 08:59:40 AM

Previously theymos has told that DT users who use the trust system to negative tag a person for their posting habits will not longer remain a DT member.

I have nothing personally against JollyGood , but I wonder if any of the DT members who have it on their list have removed (distrust) him due to inappropriate use of negative feedback? Personally, I felt on my skin that such abuse is punished by other DT members very expressively without any hesitation.

No, mostly because he didn’t do it to some poor undeserving user out of some personal vendetta to destroy their account..

He was right, even though he used the wrong tag button..

Many DT make much more abusive tags and get away with it over much worse circumstances like personal feuds..

Wrong use of tag but not very egregious or malicious..

Jolly is a good member, and he did a great job in the fight against fraudsters. things like this can make him better and more precise in leaving feedback. I know he's corrected his rating a couple of times already after a suggestion, which is a good sign and means that he is still trying to be rational when using trust system over Bitcointalk.
I will leave it still on my trust list but I will certainly pay attention to his feedbacks, in the end, it is the same with everyone else on my list whom I have trusted.