Quote from: pawanjain on Today at 02:52:01 AM

Quote from: BTCappu on October 07, 2020, 07:45:46 PM

~snip~
4. When owners' fund is not enough to provide attractive pay rate, you may reduce required weekly posts to 20 or 15. This may help to get reputed and sustaining participants.

25 posts per week is not a huge requirement but reducing it to 20 posts would be an ideal choice and this will also reduce spam in the forum. ~

Agree with you guys. Check the participant list of week 1,
User Google+ have made 23 post and user suzanne5223 have made 20 post during 1st week. Both of them weren't applicable for payment as they couldn't fulfill the minimum 25 post requirement. And they have been kicked out from week 2 list!!

It's like forcing user to make minimum 25 post to stay in the list and applicable for the payment. Which may lead some user to make spam or useless reply/post to get payment.

Quote from another signature campaign

Quote

We will pay minimum for 10 and maximum for 25 posts per week

This campaign owner and manager need to bring some change like this, pay per post. Cause they aren't paying too high amount but minimum post requirement seems high. The change may bring good user who will make qualitative post.

Quote from: domarakooth on Today at 05:46:43 AM

Quoted for ref.

I have noticed it too. Actually he received 19 merits and sent 40 merits in last 120 days. Maybe he counted and posted his sent merit amount here by mistake.