@Coinsbit and sock puppets: FYI

Quote from: Trade Runner on Today at 10:04:45 PM

Quote from: BTCU_ULTIMATE on Today at 08:17:27 PM

We remind everyone!!!

How often do you want to repeat your announcement? In the meantime all profile pictures on the Coinsbit and BTCU websites have been deleted. Seems so that suddenly nobody wants to be personally responsible anymore. Meanwhile you deleted also the fake members list at your initial posting. Focused on the two relevant guys we had Andriy Saranenko, listed as COO at BTCU, who wrote to be IT Project Manager at Prof-it Ltd/Coinsbit.io on LinkedIn. A few days ago he changed it to Head of Product and Project Managers at Prof-it Blockchain Technologies Ltd. Ukraine. Meanhwile I can't find his LinkedIn profile anymore, and his connected website shows only a server error. Nothing anyone would take serious. Then we had Dmytro Dehtiarenko, listed as CTO at BTCU, I found no public available info. The only Dmytro Dehtiarenko I found is a Junior Golang Developer from the Ukraine with 48 contacts on Linkedin as well, who graduated last year with a bachelor's degree from the National University of Kiev-Mohyla Academy in Information Technology, his main skills: Golang - but his profile pic at LinkedIn compared with the fake BTCU team (see e.g. the last participants of the Hackathon) shows that they are obviously not identical:

Dmytro Dehtiarenko, Junior Golang Developer

So who is this person presented as Dmytro Dehtiarenko really? Is it a fake identity, impersonating the real Dmytro Dehtiarenko? Anyway, after my last email is still unanswered, which I sent to all responsible persons at Coinsbit, it's clear at they have absolutely no interest to resolve or at least to clarify any of those scam accusations, therefore I will shortly inform each single participant of the Hackathon beginning on Friday about the upcoming BTCU scam and fake fork. Coming in this context a last time back to the technological considerations the guys mentioned above would have had a little, little and single chance to let it at least look like a Bitcoin fork. After all, Bitcoin has of course also implemented the PoS mode for the date on which all coins are mined. If they would have taken just that code as basis and said: “Hey guys, we make a fork in getting in the PoS mode already” then one could say: Ok, they tried it at least. But then all real stake holders would be forging and verifying the transactions, and not their own master nodes or any “authoritative advisers, blockchain companies and crypto exchanges” determined by themselves! They call it PoS consensus (proof of Stake), but at the same time they rule out the real stake holders, means the holders of the most valuable wallets, at least always ready to start a 50 % attack in controlling their own master nodes. This is the point where it's getting a fake and potential future scam. What they're now announcing is nothing more than: “Hey guys, we're making a Bitcoin fork getting into the PoS mode already, but nobody will be allowed to forge, just our own master nodes and a few master nodes we will determine and which we can recall at any time at our own discretion.” A company's internal bockchain concept opened to the public, under the control of a few Ukrainian guys coming from the Coinsbit exchange, known for maintaining fake charts, fake trades and for systematically locking out members which made too much profit in their eyes, with the final goal of grabbing their funds, rejecting any attempt of a constructive solution. This is what I would call the next attempt of a mega scam. I would not invest a single penny into such project!