Quote from: BountyDetective on Today at 07:19:33 PM

Quote from: xenon131 on Today at 07:10:53 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on Today at 06:21:20 PM

~

I made him red second time for lying in revenge. His Turkindo52 shiller who called me "racist" was also tagged. Both are not trustworthy. I will not wonder if Turkindo52 is his alt.

You used Altcoinstalks to hide your identity. You fought with us one month ago. You said you wished ClipX thread opened one month ago.
And both of your's nicknames are "Xenon" Additionally, both of you guys are enemies of Bounty Detective. Are all of them coincidence?

You are racist and liar. We have sent screenshots. Also, we don't use alt accounts. Otherwise, we have a team of 11 people, and all of us can open too many alt accounts. We don't do it, we fight fair, not like you.

As I said before, you are abusing your default trust and threatening everyone to give negative trust. You did it back from an anonymous account and then deleted the conversation.

You can be sure that because of your kind of people, too many people are losing their trust in Bitcointalk. You can do a simple Telegram and Google research about it. We are not afraid of your "rank." You can give 100 negative trusts. The community's support is obvious.

We require fair global admins to punish you, and we will do our best to provide it. While you were chatting here, we were doing business, that is why we don't have a hero rank. You should not be so arrogant about your rank.

what do you start to bury yourself
in the first place - in your opinion, I will be rude, insulted, and I should be silent ? For the record, I called your Manager the same name as he did at first, was I offended ? didn't like it ? Second - how can I delete the conversation if I was thrown in the block ?
and the group is not available to me, I'll tell you a secret, when you block a person, THE administrator has a check mark "Delete all correspondence of this person", so who deleted the messages ? cleaned up the history, and now you're trying to lie as it justifies itself ?