Ich enttäusche dich ja nur ungern aber Studien belegen genau das Gegenteil.
Hier eine Publikation in The Lancet, in der man Daten aus insgesamt 50 Ländern erhoben und ausgewertet hat.
Studie: A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomesErgebnis:Rapid border closures, full lockdowns, and wide-spread testing were not associated with COVID-19 mortality per million people.
Auch das National Bureau of Economic Research hat mit einer Publikation aufgezeigt, dass sich das Virus unabhängig von irgendwelchen Maßnahmen überall gleich verhalten hat.
Die
Studie findet man unter anderem hier:
Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Do Not Lead to Reduced COVID Transmission Rates or Deaths, New Study Suggests Ergebnis:The paper’s conclusion is that the data trends observed above likely indicate that nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) – such as lockdowns, closures, travel restrictions, stay-home orders, event bans, quarantines, curfews, and mask mandates – do not seem to affect virus transmission rates overall.
Why? Because those policies have varied in their timing and implementation across countries and states, but the trends in outcomes do not.
Auch Dr. David Nabarro, der WHO-Sonderbeauftragte für Covid-19, hat in einem Interview diese Woche dazu gedrängt, damit aufzuhören "Lockdowns als primäre Kontrollmethode einzusetzen".
Zitat: “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr. David Nabarro said to The Spectator’s Andrew Neil. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Quelle: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/who-official-urges-world-leaders-to-stop-using-lockdowns-as-primary-virus-control-method Aber das wollen die Corona- Faktenverweigerer hier ja nicht ...
