Quote from: br0ken on October 18, 2020, 05:41:29 AM

Quote from: Miiike on October 16, 2020, 07:06:31 AM

Quote from: Bitcoinrand on October 15, 2020, 03:46:46 PM

Bitcoinrand has

You do aware that even if you went silent for two weeks (which, the action itself doesn't show a good sign of a trustworthy project) I'll still be here and notified when you're back posting on your thread, don't you?

Still waiting for reply on my previous question. Namely, which social and contact platform that should assure us of your legitimacy, and how many from total supply of token allocated for team?

Also, as you went silent for two weeks, what did you do during that time?

Agree! I have the same issue. The dev rarely and barely answers any questions, especially when they are pretty solid questions,, or things that need addressing.

As for the "team" .. i have enough information on this team that I will myself come back and post later today, along with a few other questionable things.

All in all, certainly not a very trustworthy project and certainly not a very trustworthy dev either. Keep an eye on this thread for my updates

Quote from: Bitcoinrand on Today at 12:06:52 AM

Proven by time? What had to be proven of them? The proof was in the cryptographic algorithm that is instantly proven by logic. Not time. You folks seem to have 0 decentralization understanding. You'll are complaining that a decentralized project doesn't have centralized info? Are you'll for real? Go work at a bank.

Well, so far they haven't dumped their token, have they? And so far, there is a huge and solid community supporting them, that's built and proven by time. Did you not aware you're "riding" their name and reputation by now? Publishing on a forum named bitcointalk, not a bitcoinrandtalk, and jokes on you, even your project name were borrowing their name. Why was that if it's not to ride their reputation?

Quote from: Bitcoinrand on November 08, 2020, 11:52:16 AM

I hate to be the one to say it. You're all cryptocurrency critics yet are arguing for the opposite of the core benefits of cryptocurrency as well as the main problem which the purpose of crypto in Satoshis mission was to remove.

I'll quote from the Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto:

"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,
allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted
third party."

If you'll are trying to trust the team on a project created to remove the need for trust. Well folks, please get some logical understanding before teaching those trying to learn the opposite of what the mission of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency is in regard to trust.

I hate to be the one breaking it out to you, but we're in 2020, it's not 2017 anymore. The mayhem of the waves of scam brought by 2017-2018 morphed cryptocommunity, they need to do researches on new projects, they need to know essential info and be assured their investment will be safe. And (again, I repeat myself) so far you didn't show any good sign. Not only you refused to answer essential info asked, you're also inconsistent in attending this thread, only clocking in every two or three weeks, and going evasively aggressive in purpose to avoid answering questions. Should this kind of behavior encourage people to invest? Would you invest on someone who refuses to tell you anything they asked?

Here, I'll quote the first article shown by google if you searched he meaning of trustless cryptocurrency to reply your ultimate weapon of "bitcoin this so i this and nakamoto that so I that"

Quote from: https://academy.binance.com/en/glossary/trustless

It’s important to consider that trustless systems do not completely eliminate trust, but rather distribute it in a type of economy that incentivizes certain behaviors. In such cases, trust is minimized but not eliminated./quote]

I think you'll need to redefine your "trustless" understanding, or perhaps learn more about the culture of recent cryptocurrency ICOs