Quote from: Stalker22 on Today at 05:59:09 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 01:39:17 PM

I never doubted Jeremy Franklin's link (as such), but was puzzled when following the link they provided found that google itself then said the text couldn't be found so it's good to know that others have been able to corroborate the OP's assertions.

I just spent an extra five minutes on this. Wink

As it turns out, google won't be of much help if some form of word spinning and article rewriting tools are used, as it is done in this case. So I tried with some other sentences and phrases from the post in question.

Take this, for example:

Quote from: SiNeReiNZzz on June 08, 2020, 11:37:09 PM

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
...

If we put quotation marks on the first part of the sentence (before the comma) and do a full phrase search, google will correctly identify the source and list the specified book in the search results.

There are more examples like this where the identical sentence structure as well as their order as in the original material is clearly visible. I understand why SiNeReiNZzz does not accept this, but in my opinion this is a classic case of plagiarism. There are too many matches to be accidental.

Oh man, what do you want to explain?
I've pointet out my sources... NO TEXT SPINNING! Roll Eyes