Quote from: Lorence.xD on Today at 10:43:05 AM

Quote from: KaneVWE on Today at 09:58:38 AM

~snip

The link is another rabbit hole regarding the beef with this Lauda. You can never really trust someone in the Internet, how come this people get dragged on by the supposed lies if there were opposers back then.

1. There are no " supposed" lies. The lies are there and confirmed.
2. Yes thankfully there were those there to oppose the lies but that doesn't mean everyone read the oppositio
3. That's like saying no scammer is a scammer if they are opposed in public.
4. Not everyone was dragged on and thankfully. If you were around at the time a huge proportion of traders and members called it out for an instamine scam after CH called it out.

The main issue actually was lauda decided to use the trust system to punish persons mentioning his scamming history.
However, that only happened after lauda randomly attacked them and made false allegations against them.

" supposed" , " beef" ?

Scammer = lauda
Scammer hunter = ch

Simple.

Lauda uses the bogus trust system to punish his whistleblower ch

Simple.

Laudas dumb ass pal tman admitted in public slapping ch with red trust for presenting evidence of laudas scamming.

Simple.

Goodbye user account lauda. I'll just talk to the scammer via his new alt.