Quote from: Anyobsss on October 23, 2020, 03:48:43 PM

Quote from: Anonymous100 on October 21, 2020, 12:05:03 AM

Quote from: JHORN on May 24, 2020, 12:37:46 PM

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Restriction of participants is also the best thing, as it will provide sufficient results for the participants. However, it also had a negative impact on some participants. If a project is promising but limits participants, it is unfortunate for participants who do not get the opportunity.

$ 3000 is a very small amount. We can avoid this if we see a large number of participants listed in the spreadsheet.

They would not agree with it tho. The more participants the better. They will not care about how much the participants will earn. As long as their project are promoted they will have no problem with it.

I guess the problem starts with the numerous number of participants but very few bounty campaigns.

Yes. This benefits the developer of the project, while those of us who promote the project will not get anything.
If it is a low cost project to promote, it is better to limit participants, but if the promotional costs are high, there is no need to restrict participants.