Quote from: Tytanowy Janusz on Today at 09:41:20 AM

Quote from: john1010 on Today at 08:05:19 AM

I hate to see that I never got a good score in validation because of too many irrelevant filps, I hope that the team may study how to prevent the bad flips, because even you are smart enough, you can never understand most of the flips in validation time.

I hope that team will 100% focus on sharding/oracle/smart contrants. IDENA (validation) is not about making people fill good about how high their score is (how intelligent are they). It is about separeting bots from real person. Real person is someone with more than 60% in short, 75% from 10 shorts and 75% in long session. If you have more than it means that your score is correct (real person is verified, bot is separated) and validation session works correctly.

BTW:

And this includes all errors (f.e. flip didn't load), my obvious mistake because of validating while being drunk etc.

To be honest ... lately i was thinking that dumb, no sense flips is a double-edged sword. Its harder to validate because of them but ... its also impossible for AI to figure it out. And we ... humans will always try to think what would majority do with such dumb flip and in most cases it works. AI will go random in such situation. So dumb, no sense flips do their job too (separeting bot from real person)... maybe even better than obvious flips (car driving, car crash, hospital, cemetery) because they are (or they will be) easy for AI.

I agree with you, but the fact is many people who are creating flips might doesn't know how to do it correctly or neither know the correct story word as a guideline in creating a good flip, the bad thing is, the validating system follow the images that the creator was uploaded. So we have no power to reject it because weather we like it or not we need to guess which one of the flip images are correct.