Quote from: MayDay11 on March 06, 2014, 02:46:13 PM

Quote from: tinstar on March 06, 2014, 02:32:22 PM

Quote from: MayDay11 on March 06, 2014, 02:20:00 PM

We've decide on its name a long time ago,so it may still be GRANDCOIN because we have fixed its name months before and the name has already embeded in the coding lines.So in order to release it on time ,we decide on this name despite of an Grandcoin already exists.

What, are you coding this on manuscript? Just "Replace all" instances of "GRC" and "grandcoin" in an instant.

Sheesh... can't even come up with an original name. I feel queasy just reading this tbh...
Good luck with your definitely-not-a-scam-coin.

Not that easy.We have a lot of cooperation plan with Ctrip Co.,TV stations and more big names,also Standford.This coin is just here on bitcointalk to spread the fame,actually we have already carried out the promotion plan long ago.Dont be emotional,we have a lot of investors,we just want to distribute the coins cheaply so that the popularity gains quickly in the first round,if you wish.When we release the wallet and the Ads,you'll definitely know why this is not a scam,buddy.

I am just pitching in as well to say it is a very bad idea to go with Grandcoin.
It is unfair to your investors because it is going to be generally seen by the public as a bad move.
It is unfair to the other grandcoin - they had the name first and this will cause confusion and issues on the markets.

Also how you list off big names with a coin that is unknown and appears to be early in development indicates you are full of it.
I would set the scam alert on high just because you slipped those names. Stanford? Prove it.