Quote from: Evgen Kakoito on Today at 07:36:48 AM

Now recalculate your "inventions" taking into account the number of bitcoin and longcoin bits. Especially for the little ones:

1. There are 100 million satoshi in one bitcoin
2. One block was 25 bitcoins (after 12.5 and 6.25)
3. There was 2.5 billion (after 1.25 and 0.625 billion) in one bitcoin block

One block, Karl! This is the same as the entire emission of Longcoins for the year. With a small difference - Bitcoin coins are needed only "for money", while Long coins are needed to transfer messages and content. No coin will be able to repeat the success of bitcoin "as money", therefore, pushing to inflate the value for the coin, cutting emission into nothing, which has a completely different purpose, is nonsense.

How could it be easier to say. Some half-dead coins even have bunches of developers every 2-3 months, beautiful (design) roadmaps cause piggy delight of the public. The ways of the crowd are inscrutable. I also laughed for a long time at Doge, until ...

Ok, from your logic, it should be understood that you mean accepting 1 Long=1 Satoshi ? When you parsed the reward for the extracted block, then the reward for the extracted block should be 100,000,000 and by analogy you give the reward for the block should start with 5,000,000,000 Long so it turns out ? Shocked

In no case did I mean the amount of Satoshi in bitcoin, it doesn't make sense at all, I was talking about a reasonable approach to inflation that's what I was talking about. Far-reaching plans and healthy ambitions for a project are always good, you just need to be a little realistic, and not reduce everything to what coin is divisible and what is not. If you do not mean Long as a means of payment, but consider it only as a mechanism for creating and transmitting messages and content, then you should have started by placing it on airdrop platforms and not on exchanges. It seems to me that there is no contradiction in the fact that a coin can perform many functions, such as payments, sending messages and content, a means for finding consensus, etc.