Can you not use the raw transaction in the first post?
That's the "old" transaction (with the higher transaction fee) that gets rejected for a variety of fees (such as too high fee).
It will get rejected due to another reason: "too high fees". That includes blockcypher.
I've already tried posting that TX (see post from about a week ago which includes screen grabs of various nodes rejecting that TX)
How can there be a slim chance? Should I keep re-broadcasting in hopes that a small miner would accept it?
Yes,
Since 150+ nodes are still accepting it, there's a 'very very slim' chance that it will get into a mining nodes' mempool (
that also accepts such transactions).
But re-broadcasting it after getting dropped isn't worth it, IMO.I don't mind trying to broadcast the newer (lower fee paid) given there has been reports that the first TX has fallen out of the mempool and/or was never accepted in the first place.
He needs the one with the normal fee.
#Persistence
Okay, one with lower fee:
01000000000101c0ee957139541ad18cb3367a4dd0606bbc8c5bd1585ce64e813c5c21359e3f6e0
000000017160014ef3247d77adecb1f22692e899931e75e1a5cbb26ffffffff01e63d0423000000
0017a9146b4e110311345ba00ff2bb77d569e7f4a0651c6387024830450221008467643b0f6be6b
9c47020bbc824908b5b391a752e416fefcba597d2be1ad5db02200756619fe6db4bcd694dbee6e0
fdc332f06a7b187dd3de6e756c6f7c21d3bdde0141044b8d17d6f5fae04c9213da069f4e9fdd25d
f5f567f867a6a957a850c45a602b788c4a699afacbca54cfc5ba0cd659f20575f2fb20eee6ed73c
f8bb7dd95e3fd200000000