Quote from: BITCOIN4X on Today at 05:21:56 PM

Quote from: ~Money~ on Today at 04:54:22 PM

I personally feel that we should use this weapon very carefully and give red trust after giving at least 1 warning to a member.

I don't think we should have any more warning before the red tag is given. The reason is because If I'm not mistaken then we already have the previous 33 warning point as a forum rule. If a user break this rule then it is possible that DT member can mark their account with a red tag as the reason for breaking the rule. The 33 point that I mentioned must always be remembered and read so as not to make mistake in making decision that will later become habit. As in one example, someone complained and continued to complain about the unfairness of staff and the merit source in distributing merit to user. If the person keep complaining and complaining, eventually there will be hate speech thrown at the staff and the merit source so that the person will be marked as a troll.

In addition, there are many thing that get a person get red tag and clearly all wrong that have been breached, especially there are warning for that.

Complaining about unfairness whilst presenting a solid case that has never been debunked is not trolling.
Please stop promugating such nonsense.
Hate speech? Another meaningless term. Is this any speech someone else doesn't approve of.
Your post could be hate speech? Why trying to conflate independently verifiable evidence as trolling?
Sounds like hate speech to me.
Also sounds like trolling as per the rules.

Sadly a Red trust account has zero meaning any longer.

Only a type 2 or 3 flag should have some meaning but don't be shocked if you find that proven scammers on DT have no red tag or flag of any kind. Because they collude to prevent them.

Red tagged accounts have zero meaning aka you cant say oh look a DT1 or multiple DT1 have tagged them they must behaviors in their histories that show they are scammers or attempting to scam or setting up a scam.

Even the flags that claim this are bogus for type 1 or can be.

If you were trust abused on the old system ( pre flag) you are treated to a red tags and a nice warning banner defaming your account as financially dangerous or telling lies that some members have located such behaviors. This could be entirely untrue if you analysed it.

Repeat after me. Red tags mean nothing alone. You would need to investigate the entire background to the claim yourself. Most are too dumb or lazy to do that.

All you have are type2 and type3 flags to rely on. Even then I would be checking for myself.
Campaign managers on the big projects are working with DT to ensure they get the best spots regardless of whether they have red tags or can even make objectively valuable posts.

Don't contradict me unless you can debunk my points with evidence because you just look like a pleb to those that will objectively analyse your reply. Bring evidence or request it from me if you're not privy to the core arguments around here since the silly new merit and trust mess was introduced.